R v Obeid [2019] NSWDC 204
Given the objective gravity of the offending—lying between the low end and mid-range of seriousness, the offender's personal and rehabilitative circumstances, the early guilty pleas, remorse, and lack of prior dishonesty offences—the appropriate sentence is an aggregate term of 2 years and 4 months to be served by way of an intensive correction order in the community, with conditions including 200 hours of community service.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina (Crown); Offender: Omar Obeid
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Offender convicted and sentenced to aggregate intensive correction order of 2 years and 4 months to be served in the community
- Legal Topics
- Facilitating Organised Car or Boat Rebirthing Activities, Sentencing, Intensive Correction Order, Objective Seriousness, Discount for Guilty Plea
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina (Crown)
Prosecution
Omar Obeid
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for facilitating organised car or boat rebirthing activities under s 154G Crimes Act 1900 and related offences?
- 2 Should an intensive correction order be imposed rather than a full-time custodial sentence?
- 3 What discount should be applied for the guilty pleas and utility?
Ratio Decidendi
Given the objective gravity of the offending—lying between the low end and mid-range of seriousness, the offender's personal and rehabilitative circumstances, the early guilty pleas, remorse, and lack of prior dishonesty offences—the appropriate sentence is an aggregate term of 2 years and 4 months to be served by way of an intensive correction order in the community, with conditions including 200 hours of community service.
Court Disposition
Offender convicted and sentenced to aggregate intensive correction order of 2 years and 4 months to be served in the community
Orders
- In respect of count 1, after a 20% discount, sentenced to imprisonment for 2 years and 2 months.
- In respect of counts 2 and 3, after a 25% discount, sentenced to imprisonment for 1 year and 2 months each.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment