Karen Morris v David Trodden t/as David Trodden & Associates Solicitors [2016] NSWSC 873

Karen Morris v David Trodden t/as David Trodden & Associates Solicitors [2016] NSWSC 873

The original subpoena was overly broad and oppressive, and insufficient conduct money was provided, so the necessary conditions to prove contempt were not met. However, defects were eventually cured by agreement following the filing of the motion. Given mutual fault and agreement on compliance, justice required that each party bear its own costs of the notice of motion.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 June 2016
Procedural Posture
Contempt Motion Relating to Subpoena Compliance in Professional Negligence Proceedings / Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Contempt Motion
Outcome
Each party to bear its own costs of the notice of motion; parties to bring in short minutes of order giving effect to the agreement.
Legal Topics
['costs' 'subpoena Compliance' 'contempt of Court']
['civil Procedure'] ['costs' 'subpoena Compliance' 'contempt of Court']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Contempt Motion Relating to Subpoena Compliance in Professional Negligence Proceedings / Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Contempt Motion

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the addressee of a subpoena was obliged to produce documents in their possession held as a firm from a former liquidator partner' 'Whether the original subpoena was oppressive or unduly onerous' 'Whether reasonable conduct money was tendered with the subpoena' 'Whether contempt proceedings were justified given the circumstances' 'Appropriate order for costs where compliance is ultimately agreed after motion for contempt']

Ratio Decidendi

The original subpoena was overly broad and oppressive, and insufficient conduct money was provided, so the necessary conditions to prove contempt were not met. However, defects were eventually cured by agreement following the filing of the motion. Given mutual fault and agreement on compliance, justice required that each party bear its own costs of the notice of motion.

Court Disposition

Each party to bear its own costs of the notice of motion; parties to bring in short minutes of order giving effect to the agreement.

Orders

  • ['Each party to bear its own costs of the notice of motion.' 'Parties to submit short minutes of order reflecting their agreement.']