O'Leary v O'Leary & Eccles [2010] NSWSC 1347

O'Leary v O'Leary & Eccles [2010] NSWSC 1347

Adequate provision for the proper maintenance and advancement in life of the plaintiff, the deceased's widow, was not made under the will. Considering her age, needs, health, lack of assets, and the modest estate, a family provision order in the form of a Crisp order for purchase of a unit (up to $190,000), plus a lump sum for exigencies and provision for expenses, constituted proper and adequate provision, balancing the widow's needs and not disproportionately disadvantaging other beneficiaries.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 December 2010
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
Family provision order made in favour of the plaintiff; details of orders to be settled by the parties or further argument on outstanding issues including costs.
Legal Topics
['family Provision Order' 'adequacy of Provision' "testator's Duty" 'crisp Order' 'spousal Entitlement' 'small Estate']
['succession Law'] ['family Provision Order' 'adequacy of Provision' "testator's Duty" 'crisp Order' 'spousal Entitlement' 'small Estate']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Application / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the plaintiff, as widow, was left without adequate provision for her proper maintenance and advancement in life under the deceased's will" 'Whether a family provision order should be made, and if so, its nature and quantum']

Ratio Decidendi

Adequate provision for the proper maintenance and advancement in life of the plaintiff, the deceased's widow, was not made under the will. Considering her age, needs, health, lack of assets, and the modest estate, a family provision order in the form of a Crisp order for purchase of a unit (up to $190,000), plus a lump sum for exigencies and provision for expenses, constituted proper and adequate provision, balancing the widow's needs and not disproportionately disadvantaging other beneficiaries.

Court Disposition

Family provision order made in favour of the plaintiff; details of orders to be settled by the parties or further argument on outstanding issues including costs.

Orders

  • ['Plaintiff to receive by way of provision out of the estate, an order in the nature of a Crisp order amounting to $190,000 to purchase a unit in Nareen Gardens; purchase costs to be paid by the estate.' "Unit to be held in the name of the estate (executors as trustees); proceeds (less any capital loss up to 30%) to...