R v Cockburn [2006] NSWDC 131
The offender, having acted with a high degree of recklessness in placing the child in a shower without ensuring water safety and failing to provide timely medical attention, demonstrated criminality warranting imprisonment. Special circumstances justified a variation in statutory ratio, but no penalty other than imprisonment was appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- conviction and imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- ['failure of Person With Parental Responsibility to Care for Child' 'recklessness' 'maliciously Inflicting Grievous Bodily Harm' 'sentencing' 'child Abuse']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Did the offender maliciously inflict grievous bodily harm?' 'Did the offender fail to provide adequate care to a child for whom he was responsible?' 'What is the appropriate sentence, considering aggravating and mitigating factors?']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender, having acted with a high degree of recklessness in placing the child in a shower without ensuring water safety and failing to provide timely medical attention, demonstrated criminality warranting imprisonment. Special circumstances justified a variation in statutory ratio, but no penalty other than imprisonment was appropriate.
Court Disposition
conviction and imprisonment
Orders
- ['Count 1: Convicted and sentenced to a fixed term of imprisonment for six months from 19 October 2006.' 'Count 2: Convicted and sentenced to a non-parole period of nine months from 19 January 2007 to 18 October 2007 and an additional term of twelve months to expire on 18 October 2008. Released to parole on 18...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment