Fair Work Ombudsman v Woolworths Group Limited (The Calculation Employees) [2022] FCA 203
Due to insufficient information to choose between the proposed numbers, applying the precautionary principle, the proceedings should advance on the basis of 32 Calculation Employees to avoid the risk of the sample being too narrow and difficult to expand later.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Employment and Industrial Relations / Interlocutory Decision Regarding Sample Size for Calculation Employees
- Outcome
- The parties are to proceed on the basis of 32 Calculation Employees as proposed by the Applicant.
- Legal Topics
- ['underpayment' 'sample Group Selection' 'class Action Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Employment and Industrial Relations / Interlocutory Decision Regarding Sample Size for Calculation Employees
Legal Issues
- 1 ['How many Calculation Employees should be used as a sample in assessing alleged underpayment claims against Woolworths.']
Ratio Decidendi
Due to insufficient information to choose between the proposed numbers, applying the precautionary principle, the proceedings should advance on the basis of 32 Calculation Employees to avoid the risk of the sample being too narrow and difficult to expand later.
Court Disposition
The parties are to proceed on the basis of 32 Calculation Employees as proposed by the Applicant.
Orders
- ['The parties confer and provide to Chambers, within 7 days, a short minute of order giving effect to these reasons and addressing any outstanding pleading questions.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment