Fair Work Ombudsman v Hu (No 3) [2020] FCA 936
The Court accepted the agreed penalties as appropriate given the seriousness of contraventions, the vulnerability of affected employees, the financial loss suffered, and the respondent's early admissions and remorse, consistent with established principles regarding penalisation for breaches of the Fair Work Act.
- Parties
- Applicant: Fair Work Ombudsman; Respondent: Tao Hu
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Penalty Determination After Admissions
- Outcome
- Pecuniary penalties imposed as agreed between the parties.
- Legal Topics
- Pecuniary Penalties, Fair Work Act, Contraventions of Award Provisions, Accessorial Liability, Employment Entitlements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fair Work Ombudsman
Applicant
Tao Hu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Penalty Determination After Admissions
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate penalty for admitted contraventions of ss 45 and 536(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)?
- 2 Should the Court accept the parties' proposed agreed penalties for civil remedy provisions?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court accepted the agreed penalties as appropriate given the seriousness of contraventions, the vulnerability of affected employees, the financial loss suffered, and the respondent's early admissions and remorse, consistent with established principles regarding penalisation for breaches of the Fair Work Act.
Court Disposition
Pecuniary penalties imposed as agreed between the parties.
Orders
- Declarations made regarding respondent's involvement in contraventions of s 45 and 536(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
- Respondent to pay total pecuniary penalties of $22,440.00 within 28 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment