Fam v Fairfield City Council [2024] NSWLEC 1721
As the parties' agreement is a decision the Court may have made in the proper exercise of its functions, and jurisdictional prerequisites are satisfied, the appeal is upheld and the order is modified accordingly.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Richard Fam; Second Applicant: Liz Fam; Respondent: Fairfield City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Disposition Following Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Orders made by consent; Development Control Order modified.
- Legal Topics
- Development Control Order, Demolish Works Order, Modification of Order, Appeal Procedure, Conciliation Conference
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Fam
First Applicant
Liz Fam
Second Applicant
Fairfield City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Disposition Following Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the jurisdictional prerequisites for modification of a development control order under s 8.18(4)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 are satisfied
- 2 Whether the parties' agreement could be made by the Court in exercise of its powers
Ratio Decidendi
As the parties' agreement is a decision the Court may have made in the proper exercise of its functions, and jurisdictional prerequisites are satisfied, the appeal is upheld and the order is modified accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Orders made by consent; Development Control Order modified.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Pursuant to s 8.18(4)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the terms of the Development Control Order No.3 dated 5 September 2023 given by Fairfield City Council to Mr Richard Fam and Ms Liz Fam and relating to 36 Riverview Road Fairfield NSW 2165 legally described as Lot 75 DP 11685, Lot 1 DP...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment