Fairfield City Council v Shabaa [2024] NSWLEC 134
Reasonable attempts to serve by personal service were unsuccessful owing to the respondent's absence and property status; email communication evidenced likely notice. Therefore, substituted service via affixing documents and emailing is justified and ordered.
- Parties
- Applicant: Fairfield City Council; First Respondent: Retha Shabaa; Second Respondent: Haider Al Dhalimi
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Land and Environment Court Proceedings / Motion for Substituted Service
- Outcome
- Motion for substituted service granted as amended (first respondent only).
- Legal Topics
- Substituted Service, Service of Documents, Civil Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fairfield City Council
Applicant
Retha Shabaa
First Respondent
Haider Al Dhalimi
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Land and Environment Court Proceedings / Motion for Substituted Service
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the preconditions for substituted service under r 10.14 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 are met for the first respondent
- 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to order substituted service in the circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Reasonable attempts to serve by personal service were unsuccessful owing to the respondent's absence and property status; email communication evidenced likely notice. Therefore, substituted service via affixing documents and emailing is justified and ordered.
Court Disposition
Motion for substituted service granted as amended (first respondent only).
Orders
- Leave granted to amend notice of motion.
- Service of amended notice of motion dispensed with under r 18.2(c).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment