FAIRFIELD CITY COUNCIL v BROWN and ORS [1995] NSWCA 146

FAIRFIELD CITY COUNCIL v BROWN and ORS [1995] NSWCA 146

The appeal was dismissed on the basis that, even if the only basis for supporting the orders at first instance were that the Court in its discretion ought to refuse the relief sought, the original orders were proper and should not be disturbed.

Parties
Appellant: Fairfield City Council; Respondent: Brown
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 August 1995
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Local Environmental Plan, Prohibited Uses, Existing Use Rights, Development Consent, Injunctions, Judicial Discretion
Building Control Town Planning Environmental Law Local Environmental Plan Prohibited Uses Existing Use Rights Development Consent Injunctions +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fairfield City Council

Appellant

Brown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Waitangi Festival, if held, would involve a breach of the Fairfield Local Environment Plan
  2. 2 Whether existing use rights provided a defence to the proceedings
  3. 3 Whether the Court retained a discretion to refuse an injunction

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed on the basis that, even if the only basis for supporting the orders at first instance were that the Court in its discretion ought to refuse the relief sought, the original orders were proper and should not be disturbed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.