FanFirm Pty Limited v Fanatics, LLC (No 2) [2024] FCA 826
The Court found that the respondent did not establish a proper basis to stay the Injunction. The balance of convenience and the evidence indicated that the damage or prejudice likely to be suffered by the respondent as a result of the Injunction does not outweigh the prejudice to the applicant should the order be stayed. Geo-blocking measures were available for compliance. The stay application for rectification of the Register was granted given undertakings and agreement between the parties, but not for the Injunction beyond a short transitional period.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay of Orders / Post Judgment; Stay Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for stay partially granted
- Legal Topics
- ['practice and Procedure' 'trade Marks' 'stay of Orders' 'injunctions' 'rectification of Register']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Orders / Post Judgment; Stay Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a stay of orders under r 36.08 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 should be granted pending appeal' 'Whether rectification of the Trade Marks Register or an injunction is a more suitable course pending determination of appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the respondent did not establish a proper basis to stay the Injunction. The balance of convenience and the evidence indicated that the damage or prejudice likely to be suffered by the respondent as a result of the Injunction does not outweigh the prejudice to the applicant should the order be stayed. Geo-blocking measures were available for compliance. The stay application for rectification of the Register was granted given undertakings and agreement between the parties, but not for the Injunction beyond a short transitional period.
Court Disposition
Application for stay partially granted
Orders
- ['Orders 3, 4 and 5 of the orders made at 10.15 am on 17 July 2024 be stayed until 4.00 pm on 14 August 2024 or if a Notice of Appeal is filed, 28 days after the resolution of that appeal.' 'Order 2 of the 17 July Orders be stayed until 4.00 pm on 14 August 2024.' 'By 4.00 pm on 5 August 2024, the parties prepare...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment