Farah (Australia) Pty Ltd v National Union of Workers New South Wales Branch & Ors [1997] FCA 935
The evidence of loss sustained by the applicant was insufficiently quantified to displace the balance of convenience in favour of the applicant, particularly given that any losses in the interim could be compensated by an award of damages, and considering the prejudice the respondents would suffer by being restrained from protest during an unresolved industrial dispute; thus, interlocutory relief was refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interlocutory (decision on Application for Interlocutory Injunction)
- Outcome
- Application for interlocutory injunction dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Injunctions' 'secondary Boycotts' 'industrial Action' 'balance of Convenience']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interlocutory (decision on Application for Interlocutory Injunction)
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether there is a serious issue to be tried concerning the respondents' purpose under s 45D of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)" 'Whether damages are an adequate remedy for the applicant' 'Whether an interlocutory injunction should be granted restraining picketing and related conduct']
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence of loss sustained by the applicant was insufficiently quantified to displace the balance of convenience in favour of the applicant, particularly given that any losses in the interim could be compensated by an award of damages, and considering the prejudice the respondents would suffer by being restrained from protest during an unresolved industrial dispute; thus, interlocutory relief was refused.
Court Disposition
Application for interlocutory injunction dismissed
Orders
- ['The application for an interlocutory injunction be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment