Veliu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 53
None of the grounds for judicial review were established: there was no sufficient basis for apprehended bias, no failure to consider present good conduct (including police certificate), and the Tribunal correctly applied the standard of risk in its assessment. Application dismissed and costs awarded against the applicant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Federal Court First Instance Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'apprehended Bias' 'character Test' 'ministerial Discretion' 'standard of Risk Assessment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Federal Court First Instance Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tribunal's decision was affected by apprehended bias" "Whether the Tribunal failed to give sufficient weight to the visa applicant's present conduct as evidence of good character" 'Whether the Tribunal applied the correct standard regarding the likelihood of risk of repeat conduct']
Ratio Decidendi
None of the grounds for judicial review were established: there was no sufficient basis for apprehended bias, no failure to consider present good conduct (including police certificate), and the Tribunal correctly applied the standard of risk in its assessment. Application dismissed and costs awarded against the applicant.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave granted to rely on amended application dated 16 January 2018' 'Amended application is dismissed' "Applicant to pay first respondent's costs, as agreed or taxed"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment