El-Saeidy v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2019] NSWCA 289

El-Saeidy v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2019] NSWCA 289

The applicant's challenges to interlocutory decisions in the District Court, including refusal to allow oral evidence and the recusal application, did not demonstrate jurisdictional error; interlocutory judicial review applications are not maintainable except in exceptional circumstances, and no such circumstances were established here.

Parties
Applicant: Fawzi El-Saeidy; First Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW); Second Respondent: District Court of New South Wales
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 November 2019
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeals From Convictions, Apprehended Domestic Violence Orders, Procedural Fairness, Bias and Recusal Applications, Professional Responsibilities of Solicitors, Uniform Civil Procedure Rules
Criminal Law Procedural Law Judicial Review Appeals From Convictions Apprehended Domestic Violence Orders Procedural Fairness Bias and Recusal Applications Professional Responsibilities of Solicitors +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fawzi El-Saeidy

Applicant

Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)

First Respondent

District Court of New South Wales

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether interlocutory decisions of the District Court, including refusal of recusal and denial of oral evidence, are subject to judicial review
  2. 2 Whether procedural decisions, such as access to sound recordings and documents, involved jurisdictional error
  3. 3 Whether interlocutory appeals alleging jurisdictional error are apt to succeed

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's challenges to interlocutory decisions in the District Court, including refusal to allow oral evidence and the recusal application, did not demonstrate jurisdictional error; interlocutory judicial review applications are not maintainable except in exceptional circumstances, and no such circumstances were established here.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Direct that the first defendant be identified as Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)
  • Dismiss the proceedings in this Court