Fayez Ali-Ahmed v SAS Trustee Corporation [2006] NSWIRComm 106

Fayez Ali-Ahmed v SAS Trustee Corporation [2006] NSWIRComm 106

The relevant legislation governing defined benefit schemes does not permit the respondent to transfer the appellant's superannuation entitlements to another fund prior to cessation of employment. Section 32F(3) of the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (Cth) precludes such rollover for defined benefit members. The appeal is dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Superannuation Appeal / Appeal Under S 88 of the Superannuation Administration Act 1996
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['defined Benefit Funds' 'superannuation Rollover' 'early Release of Superannuation' 'interest on Debts' 'choice of Fund Requirements']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Superannuation Appeal / Appeal Under S 88 of the Superannuation Administration Act 1996

  1. 1 ['Whether SAS Trustee Corporation was permitted under relevant legislation to transfer applicant’s superannuation entitlement to another fund' 'Legislative framework governing early release debt and ongoing interest charges' 'Accumulation vs defined benefit funds' 'Entitlement to employer contributions in defined benefit scheme']

Ratio Decidendi

The relevant legislation governing defined benefit schemes does not permit the respondent to transfer the appellant's superannuation entitlements to another fund prior to cessation of employment. Section 32F(3) of the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (Cth) precludes such rollover for defined benefit members. The appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed' 'Respondent should re-examine appellant’s superannuation account regarding interest charged on early release debt and notify appellant of their determination']