FCF v Commissioner of Victims Rights [2021] NSWCATAD 373
The Tribunal was not satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that FCF was a primary victim of an act of violence as defined by the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 (NSW), as there was no objective or corroborative evidence to support her allegations. Therefore, the Assessor's decision to refuse victims support was affirmed.
- Parties
- Applicant: FCF; Respondent: Commissioner of Victims Rights
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Orders After Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; Assessor's decision affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Victims Support, Recognition Payments, Deemed Refusal, Acts of Violence, Onus of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FCF
Applicant
Commissioner of Victims Rights
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Orders After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether FCF is eligible as a primary victim of an act of violence under the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 (NSW)
- 2 Whether the Assessor's decision should be affirmed or set aside
- 3 Whether the application for administrative review was lodged in time and, if not, whether time should be extended
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was not satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that FCF was a primary victim of an act of violence as defined by the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 (NSW), as there was no objective or corroborative evidence to support her allegations. Therefore, the Assessor's decision to refuse victims support was affirmed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; Assessor's decision affirmed
Orders
- Pursuant to s 41 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, time for filing the application for administrative review is extended to the date it was filed.
- Pursuant to s 63(3)(a) of the Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997, the decision of the Assessor dated 20 May 2020 is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment