Hine v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation [2008] FCA 62

Hine v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation [2008] FCA 62

Since the applicants' initial pleadings included bona fide federal claims under the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), federal jurisdiction was properly attracted to the Federal Court, and the Court retains that jurisdiction even if those claims are later withdrawn or struck out. The respondents' application to dismiss for want of jurisdiction was thus refused.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 February 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil / Motion to Dismiss (further Amended Notice of Motion)
Outcome
Motion to dismiss refused; procedural and pro bono orders made.
Legal Topics
['federal Question' 'trade Practices Act' 'jurisdiction' 'pleadings' 'civil Claims']
['federal Jurisdiction' 'civil Procedure'] ['federal Question' 'trade Practices Act' 'jurisdiction' 'pleadings' 'civil Claims']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Motion to Dismiss (further Amended Notice of Motion)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether federal jurisdiction exists when original claims under the Trade Practices Act are not colourable but may be hopeless' 'Whether the Court retains jurisdiction when federal claims are abandoned or struck out']

Ratio Decidendi

Since the applicants' initial pleadings included bona fide federal claims under the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), federal jurisdiction was properly attracted to the Federal Court, and the Court retains that jurisdiction even if those claims are later withdrawn or struck out. The respondents' application to dismiss for want of jurisdiction was thus refused.

Court Disposition

Motion to dismiss refused; procedural and pro bono orders made.

Orders

  • ['Further Amended Notice of Motion filed 19 November 2007 dismissed.' "Respondents to pay applicants' costs of the motion." 'Respondents directed to serve any request for further and better particulars of the Further Amended Statement of Claim on or before 18 February 2008.' 'Applicants to serve a reply to any...