Tontegode v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 960

Tontegode v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 960

The application was dismissed because the applicants' complaints were directed to the Tribunal's fact-finding and factual conclusions, which were open to the Tribunal on the material before it. No particulars or argument supported the s 476(1)(c) ground, the s 476(1)(a) or s 430 ground was foreclosed by Yusuf, and the applicants did not establish that s 476(1)(g) or s 476(4)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) was satisfied.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 July 2001
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa / Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment on Application
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'no Evidence Ground' 'procedural Fairness or Non Observance of Procedures' 'statelessness' 'tribunal Fact Finding']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law' 'refugee Law'] ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'no Evidence Ground' 'procedural Fairness or Non Observance of Procedures' 'statelessness' 'tribunal Fact Finding']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa / Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment on Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Tribunal failed to observe procedures required by the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), including in relation to s 430.' 'Whether a ground under s 476(1)(c) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) was established.' "Whether there was no evidence or other material to justify the Tribunal's decision within s 476(1)(g) and s 476(4)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)." "Whether the applicants' complaints were impermissible challenges to the Tribunal's findings of fact."]

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because the applicants' complaints were directed to the Tribunal's fact-finding and factual conclusions, which were open to the Tribunal on the material before it. No particulars or argument supported the s 476(1)(c) ground, the s 476(1)(a) or s 430 ground was foreclosed by Yusuf, and the applicants did not establish that s 476(1)(g) or s 476(4)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) was satisfied.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs."]