Rohner, Felix Walter & Anor v Scanlan, Linda & Anor [1998] FCA 1156
Because Lehane J had declined to order the appellants to pay the Minister's costs on the basis that the proceeding was in the nature of a test case, and the respondents did not challenge that conclusion or the costs determination, the proper result was that there be no order as to costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- No order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['test Case' 'no Order as to Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether there should be an order as to costs where the proceeding was in the nature of a test case and the respondents did not challenge the primary judge's costs determination."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because Lehane J had declined to order the appellants to pay the Minister's costs on the basis that the proceeding was in the nature of a test case, and the respondents did not challenge that conclusion or the costs determination, the proper result was that there be no order as to costs.
Court Disposition
No order as to costs.
Orders
- ['There be no order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment