Wang v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1831
The extension of time was refused because the proposed appeal had no prospects of success: the applicant had breached condition 8202, cancellation under s 116(3) was mandatory, at least the second s 119 notice stated valid grounds so the jurisdictional basis for cancellation existed, and no jurisdictional error was shown in the Tribunal's or Federal Magistrates Court's reasons.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve a Notice of Appeal / Application for Extension of Time From a Federal Magistrates Court Judgment Dismissing Judicial Review of a Migration Review Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['student Visa Cancellation' 'visa Condition 8202' 'mandatory Cancellation Under S 116(3)' 'notice of Intention to Cancel Visa Under S 119' 'extension of Time to Appeal' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve a Notice of Appeal / Application for Extension of Time From a Federal Magistrates Court Judgment Dismissing Judicial Review of a Migration Review Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal.' 'Whether the proposed appeal had arguable or reasonable prospects of success.' "Whether the cancellation of the applicant's Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa for breach of condition 8202 was mandatory under s 116(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)." 'Whether alleged defects in the s 119 notices meant the jurisdictional basis for cancellation had not arisen.' "Whether the applicant's medical condition was relevant to the cancellation decision."]
Ratio Decidendi
The extension of time was refused because the proposed appeal had no prospects of success: the applicant had breached condition 8202, cancellation under s 116(3) was mandatory, at least the second s 119 notice stated valid grounds so the jurisdictional basis for cancellation existed, and no jurisdictional error was shown in the Tribunal's or Federal Magistrates Court's reasons.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application for an extension of time within which to file and serve a notice of appeal is dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment