FERNANDES v HAYSON [1989] NSWCA 78

FERNANDES v HAYSON [1989] NSWCA 78

The trial judge resolved conflicting evidence in favour of the respondent, finding that the lane change did not cause or contribute to the appellant's injuries; no error or denial of procedural fairness occurred.

Parties
Appellant: Fernandes; Respondent: Hayson
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 November 1989
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Negligence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fernandes

Appellant

Hayson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the learned judge erred in finding the respondent not liable for the appellant's injuries arising from a motor vehicle incident.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was denied procedural fairness.

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge resolved conflicting evidence in favour of the respondent, finding that the lane change did not cause or contribute to the appellant's injuries; no error or denial of procedural fairness occurred.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.