Ferntree Homes Pty Ltd v Bernleitner [2023] NSWCATAP 169
The Appeal Panel found no error of law or inadequacy of reasons in the Tribunal decision; the builder did not make a relevant jurisdictional point at first instance, reasons were sufficient, and leave to appeal was refused as there was no substantial miscarriage of justice.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal' 'adequacy of Reasons' 'leave to Appeal' 'jurisdiction' 'damages for Defective Work']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Tribunal failed to provide adequate reasons for findings' 'Whether Tribunal erred in awarding damages against the builder' 'Whether Tribunal should have made a money order instead of a work order' 'Whether builder suffered a substantial miscarriage of justice' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted']
Ratio Decidendi
The Appeal Panel found no error of law or inadequacy of reasons in the Tribunal decision; the builder did not make a relevant jurisdictional point at first instance, reasons were sufficient, and leave to appeal was refused as there was no substantial miscarriage of justice.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused
Orders
- ['The stay of the decision made on 14 October 2022 in HB 21/31536 is lifted.' 'Leave to appeal is refused.' 'Appeal dismissed.' 'If a party wishes to bring a costs application, it must be lodged and served within 14 days attaching or referring to supporting documents.' 'The costs respondent has 14 days after receipt...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment