Carolan v Haghparast [2023] NSWCATAP 121

Carolan v Haghparast [2023] NSWCATAP 121

The Appeal Panel determined that the Tribunal's findings regarding repudiation and site access by the owners were supported by evidence adduced at hearing, and that the contract terms properly assigned responsibility for site clearance to the owners. The Panel found that none of the appellant's grounds raised issues of law or merit for leave to appeal, and that new evidence was inadmissible as it was available or related to post-hearing events.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 May 2023
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal – Consumer and Commercial Dispute / Appeal Panel Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
['home Building Act 1989 (nsw)' 'contract Termination' 'repudiation' 'construction of Contractual Terms']
['building and Construction Law' 'contract Law'] ['home Building Act 1989 (nsw)' 'contract Termination' 'repudiation' 'construction of Contractual Terms']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Internal Appeal – Consumer and Commercial Dispute / Appeal Panel Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the owners repudiated the contract by excluding the builder from the site' 'Interpretation of contractual terms regarding site clearance' 'Entitlement to damages following termination by repudiation' 'Admissibility of new evidence on appeal' 'Whether Tribunal findings were unsupported by evidence']

Ratio Decidendi

The Appeal Panel determined that the Tribunal's findings regarding repudiation and site access by the owners were supported by evidence adduced at hearing, and that the contract terms properly assigned responsibility for site clearance to the owners. The Panel found that none of the appellant's grounds raised issues of law or merit for leave to appeal, and that new evidence was inadmissible as it was available or related to post-hearing events.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • ['In so far as the appeal raises a question of law, the appeal is dismissed.' 'In so far as the appeal raises some other error, leave to appeal is refused and the appeal otherwise dismissed.' "The appellants are to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed under the applicable costs legislation."]