FFO v Cumberland Council (No 2) [2022] NSWCATAP 264
Special circumstances warranting an award of costs exist because both the stay application and the appeal lacked any tenable basis or practical utility, causing the respondent unnecessary legal costs. Discretion under s 60(2) CAT Act is properly exercised in favour of awarding costs to Cumberland Council.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Costs Determination Following Refusal of Appeal Extension and Withdrawal of Stay Application
- Outcome
- Costs ordered against appellant
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'appeals' 'special Circumstances Under S 60(2) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Determination Following Refusal of Appeal Extension and Withdrawal of Stay Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether special circumstances exist to warrant an award of costs under s 60(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 in the context of an appeal and withdrawn stay application.']
Ratio Decidendi
Special circumstances warranting an award of costs exist because both the stay application and the appeal lacked any tenable basis or practical utility, causing the respondent unnecessary legal costs. Discretion under s 60(2) CAT Act is properly exercised in favour of awarding costs to Cumberland Council.
Court Disposition
Costs ordered against appellant
Orders
- ['FFO is to pay the costs of the Council in relation to the application for a stay filed on 18 January 2022 in this matter to be agreed or assessed.' 'FFO is to pay the costs of the Council in relation to this appeal to be agreed or assessed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment