FFP v Cumberland City Council [2022] NSWCATAD 194
The Tribunal found there was no collection, use, or disclosure of the Applicant's personal information by the Respondent in any manner constituting a contravention of the Information Protection Principles under the PPIP Act as alleged, and that any internal communications were reasonable for case management, not unreasonably intrusive, and not evidence of a breach.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; no order or action taken.
- Legal Topics
- ['information Protection Principles' 'personal Information' 'disclosure to Third Party' 'reasonable Security Safeguards']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Respondent contravened Information Protection Principles under the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 in the specific conduct alleged by the Applicant']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found there was no collection, use, or disclosure of the Applicant's personal information by the Respondent in any manner constituting a contravention of the Information Protection Principles under the PPIP Act as alleged, and that any internal communications were reasonable for case management, not unreasonably intrusive, and not evidence of a breach.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; no order or action taken.
Orders
- ['The Tribunal has decided not to take any action on the matter.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment