FFS Canterbury Pty Ltd v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2017] NSWLEC 1145
The amended proposal achieves the objectives of the applicable planning controls, including site frontage, commercial depth, and parking provision. Consent is therefore granted, subject to conditions ensuring appropriate car parking solutions and activation of commercial space.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Development Appeal / Final Orders After Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Consent granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'boarding House' 'commercial Use' 'site Frontage' 'car Parking' 'compliance With Standards']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Appeal / Final Orders After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the site frontage is acceptable according to planning controls' 'Whether the commercial premises depth complies with the DCP' 'Whether the mechanical car stacker complies with Australian Standards and is an acceptable parking solution']
Ratio Decidendi
The amended proposal achieves the objectives of the applicable planning controls, including site frontage, commercial depth, and parking provision. Consent is therefore granted, subject to conditions ensuring appropriate car parking solutions and activation of commercial space.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Consent granted.
Orders
- ['The applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans.' 'The appeal is upheld.' "Consent is granted to Development Application No. 384/2015 for demolition and construction of a mixed use development containing ground floor commercial and 41 boarding rooms managers residents and 2 levels of basement car park at...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment