FHO17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 242
The grounds of appeal had no reasonable prospect of success as no jurisdictional error was demonstrated in the Tribunal's or the FCCA judge's decision; accordingly, the application for extension of time and leave to appeal was dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: FHO17; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Judicial Review, Protection Visas, Jurisdictional Error
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FHO17
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an extension of time for leave to appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether proposed grounds of appeal disclose any jurisdictional error or merit
- 3 Whether the Tribunal erred in concluding Australia did not have protection obligations to applicant
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds of appeal had no reasonable prospect of success as no jurisdictional error was demonstrated in the Tribunal's or the FCCA judge's decision; accordingly, the application for extension of time and leave to appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application for an extension of time and leave to appeal be dismissed.
- The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment