Fidelity Capital (Australia) Pty Ltd v Delic (No 2) [2022] FCA 123
Given the appellant’s only partial success on discrete issues and the reduced proof of debt admitted, it is appropriate to make no order as to costs of the appeal (save for costs thrown away by reason of the first respondent’s conduct) and to award only one-third of the appellant’s costs in the proceeding below.
- Parties
- Appellant: Fidelity Capital (Australia) Pty Ltd; First Respondent: Damir Jakov Delic; Second Respondent: Michael Slaven as Trustee in the Bankrupt Estate of Damir Jakov Delic
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Orders Following Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; orders below set aside in part; proof of debt admitted for $97,847.33; costs apportioned as specified; otherwise appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal, Costs, Proof of Debt, Orders on Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fidelity Capital (Australia) Pty Ltd
Appellant
Damir Jakov Delic
First Respondent
Michael Slaven as Trustee in the Bankrupt Estate of Damir Jakov Delic
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Orders Following Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 What are the appropriate final orders following partial success on appeal, including as to costs?
- 2 Whether the proof of debt should be admitted and in what amount?
- 3 Whether the costs orders below should be set aside and replaced?
Ratio Decidendi
Given the appellant’s only partial success on discrete issues and the reduced proof of debt admitted, it is appropriate to make no order as to costs of the appeal (save for costs thrown away by reason of the first respondent’s conduct) and to award only one-third of the appellant’s costs in the proceeding below.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; orders below set aside in part; proof of debt admitted for $97,847.33; costs apportioned as specified; otherwise appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal allowed on grounds 1A, 8, and 13 in part ($2,682.33); otherwise dismissed.
- Orders dated 5 February 2021 below set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment