Walker, D.G.C. & Anor v. Amev-Udc Finance Ltd [1985] FCA 554
By virtue of s.40(3)(b), the Supreme Court judgment of 28 May 1985 is deemed a final judgment for bankruptcy purposes, and the bankruptcy notice, which is confined to this judgment and clear in its requirements, is valid.
- Parties
- Debtor: David Gregory Charles Walker; Debtor: Christopher Neil Campbell Walker; Petitioning Creditor: AMEV-UDC Finance Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Standing Over for Sequestration Orders
- Outcome
- Petition stood over for consideration of sequestration order; court proposes to proceed to make sequestration orders.
- Legal Topics
- Final Judgment, Bankruptcy Notice, Sequestration Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Gregory Charles Walker
Debtor
Christopher Neil Campbell Walker
Debtor
AMEV-UDC Finance Limited
Petitioning Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Standing Over for Sequestration Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a judgment obtained on 28 May 1985 in the Supreme Court of New South Wales constitutes a 'final judgment' for the purposes of s.40(1)(g) of the Bankruptcy Act, 1966.
- 2 Whether the bankruptcy notice is valid given it refers only to the first of two judgments and allegedly understates the amount due.
Ratio Decidendi
By virtue of s.40(3)(b), the Supreme Court judgment of 28 May 1985 is deemed a final judgment for bankruptcy purposes, and the bankruptcy notice, which is confined to this judgment and clear in its requirements, is valid.
Court Disposition
Petition stood over for consideration of sequestration order; court proposes to proceed to make sequestration orders.
Orders
- The petition be stood over to 29 October 1985 before the Registrar.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment