Financial Services Council Ltd v Industry Super Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCAFC 92
Section 622(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) does not empower the President to appoint himself or another ordinary member to fill a casual vacancy in an Expert Panel position reserved for an Expert Panel Member, as this is inconsistent with the compositional requirements mandated by s 620(1A), which must be complied with.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations granted; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['fair Work Commission' 'default Fund Terms' 'expert Panel Composition' 'statutory Interpretation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the President of the Fair Work Commission could appoint himself to the Expert Panel for a default fund review under s 622(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)' 'Whether the Expert Panel was properly constituted in accordance with s 620(1A) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 622(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) does not empower the President to appoint himself or another ordinary member to fill a casual vacancy in an Expert Panel position reserved for an Expert Panel Member, as this is inconsistent with the compositional requirements mandated by s 620(1A), which must be complied with.
Court Disposition
Declarations granted; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ["The President's direction appointing himself to the Expert Panel is invalid." 'The Expert Panel as currently reconstituted is not as required by the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment