Donnelly v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2014] NSWCA 20
The application for a stay was refused because, although vacating the property would prejudice the applicant and her family, the applicant did not establish that the appeal was strong, the Bank faced prejudice from continuing inability to realise its judgment and accruing interest, and the balance of convenience did not favour a stay.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application for a Stay of Execution of a Writ of Possession Pending Appeal / Court of Appeal Motion
- Outcome
- Application for a stay of execution of the order for writ of possession rejected.
- Legal Topics
- ['stay of Execution' 'writ of Possession' 'appeal Prospects' 'balance of Convenience' 'prejudice to Parties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application for a Stay of Execution of a Writ of Possession Pending Appeal / Court of Appeal Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether execution of the writ of possession should be stayed pending appeal.' 'Whether the applicant had established a strong case on appeal.' 'Whether the balance of convenience and prejudice to the parties favoured a stay.']
Ratio Decidendi
The application for a stay was refused because, although vacating the property would prejudice the applicant and her family, the applicant did not establish that the appeal was strong, the Bank faced prejudice from continuing inability to realise its judgment and accruing interest, and the balance of convenience did not favour a stay.
Court Disposition
Application for a stay of execution of the order for writ of possession rejected.
Orders
- ['Reject the application for a stay of execution of the order for writ of possession.' 'Applicant to pay the costs of the respondent to the motion.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment