Fire Rescue Victoria v United Firefighters' Union of Australia [2025] FCA 74

Fire Rescue Victoria v United Firefighters' Union of Australia [2025] FCA 74

The production order made by the Fair Work Commission was extant and required the Union to produce the Trust Deed to FRV and the Commission, subject to confidentiality. The Commission's powers under ss 590 and 593 supported the obligation. FRV demonstrated a prima facie case, and the balance of convenience favoured granting a mandatory injunction, as refusal would prejudice FRV's preparation for arbitration. The application for a stay was dismissed because no substantive prejudice was shown, and the stay would not facilitate the just and efficient resolution of the dispute.

Parties
Applicant: Fire Rescue Victoria; First Respondent: United Firefighters' Union of Australia; Second Respondent: Peter Marshall
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 January 2025
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Hearing and Orders on Injunction and Stay Applications
Outcome
Application by FRV for mandatory injunction granted; Union's application for stay dismissed.
Legal Topics
Mandatory Injunction, Production Orders, Stay of Proceedings, Fair Work Commission Powers, Confidentiality Regimes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fire Rescue Victoria

Applicant

United Firefighters' Union of Australia

First Respondent

Peter Marshall

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Hearing and Orders on Injunction and Stay Applications

  1. 1 Whether a mandatory injunction should be granted to compel the production of the Trust Deed
  2. 2 Whether the claim for interlocutory relief is an abuse of process
  3. 3 Whether the claim should be stayed until the Fair Work Commission application is heard

Ratio Decidendi

The production order made by the Fair Work Commission was extant and required the Union to produce the Trust Deed to FRV and the Commission, subject to confidentiality. The Commission's powers under ss 590 and 593 supported the obligation. FRV demonstrated a prima facie case, and the balance of convenience favoured granting a mandatory injunction, as refusal would prejudice FRV's preparation for arbitration. The application for a stay was dismissed because no substantive prejudice was shown, and the stay would not facilitate the just and efficient resolution of the dispute.

Court Disposition

Application by FRV for mandatory injunction granted; Union's application for stay dismissed.

Orders

  • First respondent to produce the Trust Deed to the Fair Work Commission and solicitors for the applicant by 5:00pm on 21 January 2025, subject to confidentiality regime ordered by the Commission.
  • Paragraph 2 of the second respondent's interlocutory application seeking a stay of applicant's claim is dismissed.