Fire Rescue Victoria v United Firefighters' Union of Australia [2025] FCA 74
The production order made by the Fair Work Commission was extant and required the Union to produce the Trust Deed to FRV and the Commission, subject to confidentiality. The Commission's powers under ss 590 and 593 supported the obligation. FRV demonstrated a prima facie case, and the balance of convenience favoured granting a mandatory injunction, as refusal would prejudice FRV's preparation for arbitration. The application for a stay was dismissed because no substantive prejudice was shown, and the stay would not facilitate the just and efficient resolution of the dispute.
- Parties
- Applicant: Fire Rescue Victoria; First Respondent: United Firefighters' Union of Australia; Second Respondent: Peter Marshall
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Hearing and Orders on Injunction and Stay Applications
- Outcome
- Application by FRV for mandatory injunction granted; Union's application for stay dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Mandatory Injunction, Production Orders, Stay of Proceedings, Fair Work Commission Powers, Confidentiality Regimes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fire Rescue Victoria
Applicant
United Firefighters' Union of Australia
First Respondent
Peter Marshall
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Hearing and Orders on Injunction and Stay Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a mandatory injunction should be granted to compel the production of the Trust Deed
- 2 Whether the claim for interlocutory relief is an abuse of process
- 3 Whether the claim should be stayed until the Fair Work Commission application is heard
Ratio Decidendi
The production order made by the Fair Work Commission was extant and required the Union to produce the Trust Deed to FRV and the Commission, subject to confidentiality. The Commission's powers under ss 590 and 593 supported the obligation. FRV demonstrated a prima facie case, and the balance of convenience favoured granting a mandatory injunction, as refusal would prejudice FRV's preparation for arbitration. The application for a stay was dismissed because no substantive prejudice was shown, and the stay would not facilitate the just and efficient resolution of the dispute.
Court Disposition
Application by FRV for mandatory injunction granted; Union's application for stay dismissed.
Orders
- First respondent to produce the Trust Deed to the Fair Work Commission and solicitors for the applicant by 5:00pm on 21 January 2025, subject to confidentiality regime ordered by the Commission.
- Paragraph 2 of the second respondent's interlocutory application seeking a stay of applicant's claim is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment