FIRESTONE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD v IGIC [1990] NSWCA 62
Where calculation errors or unsustainable factual assumptions are identified and conceded or shown by agreement, the award of damages must be reduced accordingly; documentary evidence wrongly excluded does not require retrial unless it would likely have materially affected the result. Established practice regarding interest rates and assessment method is binding unless and until changed by higher authority.
- Parties
- Appellant: Firestone Australia Pty Ltd; Respondent: Igic
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal (quantum/damages)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; quantum judgment reduced
- Legal Topics
- Damages Assessment, Unsafe System of Work, Appeal on Quantum, Workers Compensation Deductions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Firestone Australia Pty Ltd
Appellant
Igic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal (quantum/damages)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in calculating past and future economic loss
- 2 Whether certain wage record documents were wrongly rejected as evidence
- 3 Proper method of calculation for future economic loss and interest
Ratio Decidendi
Where calculation errors or unsustainable factual assumptions are identified and conceded or shown by agreement, the award of damages must be reduced accordingly; documentary evidence wrongly excluded does not require retrial unless it would likely have materially affected the result. Established practice regarding interest rates and assessment method is binding unless and until changed by higher authority.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; quantum judgment reduced
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Judgment below set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment