Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group LimitedCitation:[2016] HCA 28Before:French CJ, Kiefel, Gageler, Keane, Nettle JJDate:27 Jul 2016Case Number:M219/2015, M220/2015Read more

Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group LimitedCitation:[2016] HCA 28Before:French CJ, Kiefel, Gageler, Keane, Nettle JJDate:27 Jul 2016Case Number:M219/2015, M220/2015Read more

The court held that the late payment fees were not genuine pre-estimates of damage and were out of all proportion to the actual loss suffered. The fees were therefore penalties and unenforceable under contract law.

Parties
Appellant: First Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 July 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
late payment fees found to be penalties and unenforceable
Legal Topics
Penalties, Late Payment Fees, Unconscionable Conduct, Unjust Transactions, Unfair Terms

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

First Appellant

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether late payment fees imposed by the respondent constitute penalties under contract law
  2. 2 Whether the fees are extravagant, exorbitant, or unconscionable
  3. 3 Whether the respondent's legitimate interests are confined to reimbursement of expenses directly occasioned by the appellant's default

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the late payment fees were not genuine pre-estimates of damage and were out of all proportion to the actual loss suffered. The fees were therefore penalties and unenforceable under contract law.

Court Disposition

late payment fees found to be penalties and unenforceable

Orders

  • The late payment fees imposed by the respondent are unenforceable as penalties.