Fisher v Hebburn Ltd [1960] HCA 80

Fisher v Hebburn Ltd [1960] HCA 80

Where a worker contracts a compensable disease by gradual process while employed, and subsequent incapacity arises after a statutory amendment comes into force, compensation is payable for that incapacity regardless of another pre-existing incapacity, subject to the limits and discretion set by the Workers' Compensation Act and the dependency provisions at the relevant date.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
['compensable Disease' 'statutory Retrospectivity' 'industrial Disease' 'quantum of Compensation' 'dependency Under Compensation']
["workers' Compensation" 'statutory Interpretation'] ['compensable Disease' 'statutory Retrospectivity' 'industrial Disease' 'quantum of Compensation' 'dependency Under Compensation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether compensation is payable for pneumoconiosis despite pre-existing incapacity from Buerger's disease" "Whether statutory amendment to Workers' Compensation Act applies retrospectively to injuries contracted before its commencement" "Whether weekly payments in respect of the worker's wife are payable if she was not dependent on earnings at the relevant date"]

Ratio Decidendi

Where a worker contracts a compensable disease by gradual process while employed, and subsequent incapacity arises after a statutory amendment comes into force, compensation is payable for that incapacity regardless of another pre-existing incapacity, subject to the limits and discretion set by the Workers' Compensation Act and the dependency provisions at the relevant date.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • ['Order of Supreme Court discharged' "Questions in the stated case answered: Worker entitled to compensation consisting of weekly payments in respect of himself at the Commission's discretion up to £8 16s. 0d.; not entitled to weekly payments in respect of his wife." "Cause remitted to Workers' Compensation...