Five D v Impact Building [2007] NSWSC 993

Five D v Impact Building [2007] NSWSC 993

It is manifestly unfair and would bring the administration of justice into disrepute to allow the same issues already decided in the Newcastle Local Court proceedings to be relitigated between closely connected parties in the Supreme Court. The decision of the Magistrate to summarily dismiss the statement of claim as an abuse of process is correct; there was no error of law.

Parties
Plaintiff: Five D Pty Limited; Defendant: Impact Building Pty Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 September 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Appeal From Local Court, Summary Dismissal
Civil Procedure Abuse of Process Appeal From Local Court Summary Dismissal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Five D Pty Limited

Plaintiff

Impact Building Pty Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there can be an abuse of process where a party in the current proceedings was not a party in the earlier proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the Magistrate erred in summarily dismissing the plaintiff’s claim as an abuse of process

Ratio Decidendi

It is manifestly unfair and would bring the administration of justice into disrepute to allow the same issues already decided in the Newcastle Local Court proceedings to be relitigated between closely connected parties in the Supreme Court. The decision of the Magistrate to summarily dismiss the statement of claim as an abuse of process is correct; there was no error of law.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The decision of His Honour Magistrate Dillon made on 1 March 2007 is affirmed.