Inspector Lance Taylor v Fletcher International Exports Pty Ltd (No 2) [2001] NSWIRComm 228

Inspector Lance Taylor v Fletcher International Exports Pty Ltd (No 2) [2001] NSWIRComm 228

The defendant is entitled to party/party costs after the charges were dismissed on the basis that the prosecution did not prove the essential element of employer. No evidence of unreasonable conduct by the prosecutor justifying indemnity costs was found.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 August 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Application for Costs Following No Case to Answer Decision
Outcome
Costs awarded to defendant on party/party basis; indemnity costs not granted.
Legal Topics
['costs' 'employer Identification' 'party/party Costs Vs Indemnity Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution / Application for Costs Following No Case to Answer Decision

  1. 1 ['Whether defendant should be awarded costs after successful defence of criminal charges' 'Whether costs should be awarded on an indemnity basis or party/party basis' "Effect of 'no case to answer' finding on costs"]

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant is entitled to party/party costs after the charges were dismissed on the basis that the prosecution did not prove the essential element of employer. No evidence of unreasonable conduct by the prosecutor justifying indemnity costs was found.

Court Disposition

Costs awarded to defendant on party/party basis; indemnity costs not granted.

Orders

  • ["Prosecution to pay defendant's costs on a party/party basis." "Parties ordered to meet and attempt conciliation regarding costs; if dispute remains, parties may seek Registrar's assistance before final quantified costs order." 'Leave granted to re-list the matter on short notice.']