Fleur De Lys Pty Limited v Jarrett [2004] FCA 1357
The plaintiff established genuine offsetting claims exceeding the substantiated debt amount, including untaxed costs and a debt from earlier proceedings, thus requiring the statutory demand to be set aside pursuant to s 459H(1)(b) of the Corporations Act, subject to the condition that the plaintiff applies for assessment of costs.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Fleur De Lys Pty Limited; Defendant: Kevin Jarrett
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations – Statutory Demand – Setting Aside / Hearing and Final Judgment on Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand
- Outcome
- Statutory demand set aside upon condition
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Demand, Offsetting Claim, Untaxed Costs, Costs Orders, Setting Aside Statutory Demand
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fleur De Lys Pty Limited
Plaintiff
Kevin Jarrett
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Corporations – Statutory Demand – Setting Aside / Hearing and Final Judgment on Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether untaxed costs are capable of establishing existence of offsetting claim under s 459H(1)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
- 2 Whether there is a genuine dispute about the debt for purposes of s 459H(1)(a)
- 3 Whether statutory demand should be set aside and on what terms
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff established genuine offsetting claims exceeding the substantiated debt amount, including untaxed costs and a debt from earlier proceedings, thus requiring the statutory demand to be set aside pursuant to s 459H(1)(b) of the Corporations Act, subject to the condition that the plaintiff applies for assessment of costs.
Court Disposition
Statutory demand set aside upon condition
Orders
- The statutory demand served by the defendant on the plaintiff on 19 July 2004 be set aside on condition that the plaintiff makes application for an assessment under Division 6 of Part 11 of the Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) of the costs which it is entitled to receive from the defendant pursuant to the order made...
- The defendant pay 75 per cent of the plaintiff's costs of these proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment