Application by Flexigroup Limited (No 2) [2020] ACompT 2
The NET Code, as submitted, would not likely result in net public benefit due to anti-competitive restrictions on unregulated consumer credit (including BNPL) and uncertain effects of mandatory standards, both likely producing substantial public detriment. Conditional authorisation is appropriate, requiring amendments that remove these provisions—specifically, deleting paragraph 3(d) (BNPL restriction in unsolicited sales), replacing paragraph 25 to permit BNPL where the credit provider's contract, policies, and procedures are approved for dispute resolution and hardship, and removing all references to mandatory standards, alongside strengthened consumer protection and reporting...
- Parties
- Applicant: Flexigroup Limited; Authorisation Applicants: Australian Energy Council, Clean Energy Council, Smart Energy Council and Energy Consumers Australia; Respondent: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission; Intervener: Australian Securities and Investments Commission; Intervener: RateSetter Australia RE Limited; Intervener: Consumer Action Law Centre
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Tribunal Determination (review of ACCC Authorisation) / Final Determination on Review
- Outcome
- Determination of the ACCC granting conditional authorisation varied; authorisation granted subject to Tribunal's conditions and amendments to the NET Code as specified in Annexure B.
- Legal Topics
- Industry Code Authorisations, Unregulated Consumer Credit, Buy Now Pay Later Finance, Solar and Energy Markets, Responsible Lending, Voluntary Codes of Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Flexigroup Limited
Applicant
Australian Energy Council, Clean Energy Council, Smart Energy Council and Energy Consumers Australia
Authorisation Applicants
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
Respondent
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Intervener
RateSetter Australia RE Limited
Intervener
Consumer Action Law Centre
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Competition Tribunal Determination (review of ACCC Authorisation) / Final Determination on Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the NET Code, and its provisions restricting unregulated consumer credit (including BNPL finance), produces net public benefit under s 90(7)(b) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
- 2 Whether provisions regarding mandatory standards in the NET Code are anti-competitive or cause public detriment
- 3 Whether conditions should be imposed to amend or modify the NET Code to remove likely public detriment and to impose reporting requirements
Ratio Decidendi
The NET Code, as submitted, would not likely result in net public benefit due to anti-competitive restrictions on unregulated consumer credit (including BNPL) and uncertain effects of mandatory standards, both likely producing substantial public detriment. Conditional authorisation is appropriate, requiring amendments that remove these provisions—specifically, deleting paragraph 3(d) (BNPL restriction in unsolicited sales), replacing paragraph 25 to permit BNPL where the credit provider's contract, policies, and procedures are approved for dispute resolution and hardship, and removing all references to mandatory standards, alongside strengthened consumer protection and reporting...
Court Disposition
Determination of the ACCC granting conditional authorisation varied; authorisation granted subject to Tribunal's conditions and amendments to the NET Code as specified in Annexure B.
Orders
- Authorisation applicants and future signatories may become signatories to, agree to comply with, and give effect to the NET Code, as amended by Tribunal's conditions.
- Persons constituting the Administrator and Code Monitoring and Compliance Panel may perform functions and powers given under amended Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment