Becerra, Flor v Fowell, Ronald & Anor [1983] FCA 50
The applicant failed to satisfactorily explain the delay in seeking an order of review and, even considering the broader interests of justice, the extension would not be granted due to public interest and the efficient running of Radio 2EA; accordingly, the application for extension of time was dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Flor Becerra; First Respondent: Ronald Fowell; Second Respondent: Special Broadcasting Service
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Law Application for Order of Review / Application for Extension of Time; Dismissal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Order of Review, Unreasonable Delay
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Flor Becerra
Applicant
Ronald Fowell
First Respondent
Special Broadcasting Service
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law Application for Order of Review / Application for Extension of Time; Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an extension of time to apply for order of review should be granted
- 2 When time for making the application ran under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977
- 3 Whether delay in applying for order of review was satisfactorily explained
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to satisfactorily explain the delay in seeking an order of review and, even considering the broader interests of justice, the extension would not be granted due to public interest and the efficient running of Radio 2EA; accordingly, the application for extension of time was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment