FM -v- Vice Chancellor, Macquarie University [2003] NSWADT 78
Macquarie University, via its employees, contravened s 18 of the Privacy & Personal Information Protection Act 1998 by disclosing personal information (opinions in telephone conversations and the academic transcript) about FM to UNSW, in circumstances where no statutory exception, exemption, or express consent applied; however, the evidence did not establish that FM suffered loss or damage 'because of' the disclosure of opinions in telephone calls for the purposes of s 55(4), and Macquarie’s instruction regarding transcript disclosure was sufficient. Accordingly, a restraint order was made regarding future disclosures, but no damages were awarded.
- Parties
- Applicant: FM; Respondent: Vice Chancellor, Macquarie University
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Privacy Review Application / Final Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Orders made; application otherwise dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Personal Information, Information Protection Principles, Disclosure of Personal Information, Consent to Disclosure, Review of Agency Conduct Under the Privacy & Personal Information Protection Act 1998
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FM
Applicant
Vice Chancellor, Macquarie University
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Privacy Review Application / Final Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Macquarie University contravened information protection principles by disclosing personal information about FM to UNSW
- 2 Whether disclosure of information in telephone conversations and academic transcript was authorised or exempt
- 3 Whether an order for damages or restraint should be made under the Privacy & Personal Information Protection Act 1998
Ratio Decidendi
Macquarie University, via its employees, contravened s 18 of the Privacy & Personal Information Protection Act 1998 by disclosing personal information (opinions in telephone conversations and the academic transcript) about FM to UNSW, in circumstances where no statutory exception, exemption, or express consent applied; however, the evidence did not establish that FM suffered loss or damage 'because of' the disclosure of opinions in telephone calls for the purposes of s 55(4), and Macquarie’s instruction regarding transcript disclosure was sufficient. Accordingly, a restraint order was made regarding future disclosures, but no damages were awarded.
Court Disposition
Orders made; application otherwise dismissed
Orders
- The Vice Chancellor, Macquarie University and any person employed or engaged by Macquarie University is to restrain from disclosing information or opinions in relation to students or former students, which is held in their minds, unless an exemption relating to s 18 applies.
- No order for damages or compensation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment