FNA v Commissioner of Victims’ Rights [2022] NSWCATAD 388
The application for administrative review of the 3 February 2022 recognition payment decision was filed significantly late, was not made within a reasonable time, and FNA gave no reasonable explanation for the delay. The Tribunal also found the proposed review had no prospects of success because the alleged act of violence did not fall within Category B under s 35(2) and the evidence did not provide a safe basis to find grievous bodily harm for Category C. The Tribunal therefore declined to extend time and dismissed the application. The Tribunal also stated it lacked jurisdiction to administratively review the 26 July 2022 financial assistance decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Administrative Review of a Victims Support Decision Concerning Financial Assistance and a Recognition Payment / Hearing of Application for Extension of Time and Administrative Review
- Outcome
- The application for an extension of time was refused and the application was dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['administrative Review' 'jurisdiction' 'extension of Time' 'recognition Payment' 'financial Assistance' 'grievous Bodily Harm']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Administrative Review of a Victims Support Decision Concerning Financial Assistance and a Recognition Payment / Hearing of Application for Extension of Time and Administrative Review
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to review the decision dated 26 July 2022 concerning financial assistance.' 'Whether the Tribunal should extend time for FNA to seek administrative review of the decision dated 3 February 2022 concerning a recognition payment.' 'Whether the absence of an internal review prevented the Tribunal from dealing with the application.' 'Whether FNA had prospects of establishing entitlement to a higher category recognition payment based on grievous bodily harm.']
Ratio Decidendi
The application for administrative review of the 3 February 2022 recognition payment decision was filed significantly late, was not made within a reasonable time, and FNA gave no reasonable explanation for the delay. The Tribunal also found the proposed review had no prospects of success because the alleged act of violence did not fall within Category B under s 35(2) and the evidence did not provide a safe basis to find grievous bodily harm for Category C. The Tribunal therefore declined to extend time and dismissed the application. The Tribunal also stated it lacked jurisdiction to administratively review the 26 July 2022 financial assistance decision.
Court Disposition
The application for an extension of time was refused and the application was dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application for an extension of time is refused.' 'The application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment