FND v Children’s Guardian [2024] NSWCATAD 125
FND has not overcome the statutory presumption that he poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children, based on the seriousness of his offences, ongoing lack of insight, problematic behaviour towards G.L., expert psychiatric evidence, and inability to satisfy the Tribunal that granting an enabling order would not place children at risk.
- Parties
- Applicant: FND; Respondent: Children's Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Enabling Order Under S 28(1) of the Child Protection (working With Children) Act 2012 / Final Determination – Dismissal of Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Working With Children, Enabling Orders, Risk Assessment, Child Abuse Material, Criminal Convictions and Statutory Presumptions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FND
Applicant
Children's Guardian
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Enabling Order Under S 28(1) of the Child Protection (working With Children) Act 2012 / Final Determination – Dismissal of Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether FND has rebutted the statutory presumption of posing a risk to the safety of children
- 2 Whether FND should be granted an enabling order permitting him to be treated as not disqualified for child-related work
Ratio Decidendi
FND has not overcome the statutory presumption that he poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children, based on the seriousness of his offences, ongoing lack of insight, problematic behaviour towards G.L., expert psychiatric evidence, and inability to satisfy the Tribunal that granting an enabling order would not place children at risk.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- FND's application for an enabling order under s 28(1) of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment