For the Good Times Pty Ltd v Coltern Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 807
The first, sixth, seventh, and eighth defendants were liable for breach of contract by failing to use best endeavours to secure second mortgages for the plaintiff and liable as persons knowingly concerned in misleading or deceptive conduct under s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), as the representations made caused the plaintiff to invest and lose its funds.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: For the Good Times Pty Ltd; First Defendant: Coltern Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: ACN 079 357 243 Pty Ltd; Third Defendant: Brasic Pty Ltd; Fourth Defendant: Sokido Pty Ltd; Fifth Defendant: Griffith Land Development Co Pty Ltd; Sixth Defendant: Norman Clifford Boyle; Seventh Defendant: Richard Lee Woods; Eighth Defendant: Larry Owen Hanley; Ninth Defendant: Amdoll Holdings Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Damages Claim (equity Division) / Final Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff against first, sixth, seventh and eighth defendants; verdicts (with interest) for losses as detailed; summary judgment motion dismissed; costs awarded to plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Knowingly Concerned Liability, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Best Endeavours, Joint Ventures, Summary Judgment, Second Mortgages, Damages, Shareholders' Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
For the Good Times Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
Coltern Pty Ltd
First Defendant
ACN 079 357 243 Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Brasic Pty Ltd
Third Defendant
Sokido Pty Ltd
Fourth Defendant
Griffith Land Development Co Pty Ltd
Fifth Defendant
Norman Clifford Boyle
Sixth Defendant
Richard Lee Woods
Seventh Defendant
Larry Owen Hanley
Eighth Defendant
Amdoll Holdings Pty Ltd
Ninth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Damages Claim (equity Division) / Final Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether first, sixth, seventh, and eighth defendants are liable in damages for breach of contract and as persons knowingly concerned in contraventions of s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
- 2 Whether defendants used best endeavours to secure second mortgages as required under contract
- 3 Whether misleading or deceptive conduct occurred within the meaning of s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
The first, sixth, seventh, and eighth defendants were liable for breach of contract by failing to use best endeavours to secure second mortgages for the plaintiff and liable as persons knowingly concerned in misleading or deceptive conduct under s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), as the representations made caused the plaintiff to invest and lose its funds.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff against first, sixth, seventh and eighth defendants; verdicts (with interest) for losses as detailed; summary judgment motion dismissed; costs awarded to plaintiff.
Orders
- Against Coltern Pty Ltd for $630,000;
- Against Norman Clifford Boyle for $2,178,008;
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment