Forbes Shire Council v Pace [2002] NSWSC 966

Forbes Shire Council v Pace [2002] NSWSC 966

The appeal was dismissed because the Council failed to establish that it acted in good faith in constructing the levee bank, and s 733 immunity did not extend to claims about the quality (pollution) of water affecting the fence. Damages findings were factual and open to the lower court.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 November 2002
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed. Judgment of Local Court affirmed.
Legal Topics
['nuisance' 'negligence' 'statutory Immunity' 'discharge of Effluent' 'flooding' 'good Faith' 'damages']
['torts' 'local Government Law' 'environmental Law'] ['nuisance' 'negligence' 'statutory Immunity' 'discharge of Effluent' 'flooding' 'good Faith' 'damages']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Forbes Shire Council was immune from liability under Local Government Act 1993, s 733 for damage caused by effluent flooding.' 'Whether the Council acted in good faith in constructing the levee and discharging effluent.' 'Correctness of damages assessment (loss of crop, replacement of fence).']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the Council failed to establish that it acted in good faith in constructing the levee bank, and s 733 immunity did not extend to claims about the quality (pollution) of water affecting the fence. Damages findings were factual and open to the lower court.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed. Judgment of Local Court affirmed.

Orders

  • ["Council's appeal dismissed." "Local Court's judgment in favour of Mr Pace for $11,900 plus interest and costs affirmed." 'Costs awarded against Council.']