Ford Kinter & Associates Pty Ltd, in the matter of Reliance Franchise Partners Pty Ltd (in liq) v Reliance Franchise Partners Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2025] FCA 139
Ford Kinter took substantial risk in providing indispensable funding as the only unrelated creditor, enabling successful recovery for the benefit of the liquidation. The factors under s 564 and relevant case law favour granting full priority for its debt and costs, as the impact on other creditors is limited, substantial recovery was achieved, and public interest in funding liquidators is served.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ford Kinter & Associates Pty Ltd; First Defendant: Reliance Franchise Partners Pty Ltd (in liquidation); Second and Third Defendants: Gideon Isaac Rathner and Matthew Brian Sweeny in their capacity as joint and several liquidators of Reliance Franchise Partners Pty Ltd (in liquidation); Fourth Defendant: Fopar Nominees Pty Ltd; Fifth Defendant: Vantage Holdings Group Pty Ltd; Sixth Defendant: Caviar Pty Ltd (as absolute assignee of the debt of AR Portfolio (NSW) Pty Ltd)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations—insolvency (application Under S 564 for Priority Repayment to Unsecured Creditor) / Final Judgment—orders Following Unopposed Application at First Instance
- Outcome
- Application granted—priority repayment order in favour of Ford Kinter for its full proof of debt and application costs under s 564 of the Corporations Act.
- Legal Topics
- Priority of Creditors, Creditor Funding of Liquidators, Section 564 Corporations Act Applications, Litigation Funding in Liquidation, Distribution of Insolvent Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ford Kinter & Associates Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
Reliance Franchise Partners Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
First Defendant
Gideon Isaac Rathner and Matthew Brian Sweeny in their capacity as joint and several liquidators of Reliance Franchise Partners Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
Second and Third Defendants
Fopar Nominees Pty Ltd
Fourth Defendant
Vantage Holdings Group Pty Ltd
Fifth Defendant
Caviar Pty Ltd (as absolute assignee of the debt of AR Portfolio (NSW) Pty Ltd)
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Corporations—insolvency (application Under S 564 for Priority Repayment to Unsecured Creditor) / Final Judgment—orders Following Unopposed Application at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an unsecured creditor who funded litigation in a liquidation should have priority in repayment under s 564 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
- 2 Whether the discretionary factors justify disturbing the standard order of distribution to grant priority to Ford Kinter
- 3 Whether giving Ford Kinter priority would unduly prejudice other creditors given the facts
Ratio Decidendi
Ford Kinter took substantial risk in providing indispensable funding as the only unrelated creditor, enabling successful recovery for the benefit of the liquidation. The factors under s 564 and relevant case law favour granting full priority for its debt and costs, as the impact on other creditors is limited, substantial recovery was achieved, and public interest in funding liquidators is served.
Court Disposition
Application granted—priority repayment order in favour of Ford Kinter for its full proof of debt and application costs under s 564 of the Corporations Act.
Orders
- Pursuant to s 564 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the property of Reliance Franchise Partners Pty Ltd (in liquidation) is to be distributed by its liquidators in the following priority: (a) payment of claims under s 556(1) remaining unsatisfied; (b) payment to Ford Kinter & Associates Pty Ltd of $1,552,289.56,...
- Ford Kinter & Associates Pty Ltd's costs of this application, including reserved costs, to be paid out of the property of Reliance Franchise Partners Pty Ltd (in liquidation) with the same priority as the amount in paragraph 1(b).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment