FORESTRY COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES v CHRISTOPHER SHEED [1993] NSWCA 99

There is no power to grant leave at this stage, and the applicant has not demonstrated appropriate urgency or merit for immediate convocation of a special Court of Appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Applicant: Forestry Commission of New South Wales; Respondent: Christopher Sheed
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 09 June 1993
Procedural Posture: Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory
Outcome: All relief is declined except that all time limits are abridged to allow an application for leave to appeal to be brought by summons for hearing on 15 June 1993.
Legal Topics: Injunctions Against Unknown Persons, Leave to Appeal

Civil Procedure Injunctions Against Unknown Persons Leave to Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1

Parties

Forestry Commission of New South Wales

Applicant

Christopher Sheed

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory

Legal Issues

1 Whether the court should grant an injunction against unknown persons
2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against Windeyer J's order

Ratio Decidendi

There is no power to grant leave at this stage, and the applicant has not demonstrated appropriate urgency or merit for immediate convocation of a special Court of Appeal.

Court Disposition

All relief is declined except that all time limits are abridged to allow an application for leave to appeal to be brought by summons for hearing on 15 June 1993.

Orders

All time limits abridged to allow application for leave to appeal to be heard on 15 June 1993.
All other relief declined.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.