Forge Group Power Pty Limited (in liquidation)(receivers and managers appointed) v General Electric International Inc [2016] NSWSC 52
The lease of the Turbines to Forge Power by GE was a PPS lease as defined by the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth), as GE was regularly engaged in the business of leasing goods both within and outside Australia at the time the lease was entered into; the Turbines did not become fixtures as their installation did not evince an objective intention of permanence; consequently, upon appointment of administrators, any security interest of the defendants in the Turbines vested in Forge Power immediately before that appointment under s 267(2) PPSA, giving Forge Power priority over the Turbines.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Forge Group Power Pty Limited (in liquidation) (receivers and managers appointed) (ACN 103 678 324); First Defendant: General Electric International, Inc. (ABN 85 002 420 751); Second Defendant: Power Rental Op Co Australia LLC (ARBN 167 060 997); Third Defendant: Power Rental Asset Co Two, LLC
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment / Judgment Delivered After Trial
- Outcome
- Plaintiff entitled to declaratory relief; plaintiff's title to Turbines is superior; interests of defendants in Turbines vested in plaintiff immediately before appointment of administrators.
- Legal Topics
- PPS Leases, Fixtures, Priority of Security Interests, Leasing of Goods, Attachment and Perfection Under PPSA, Effect of Vesting Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Forge Group Power Pty Limited (in liquidation) (receivers and managers appointed) (ACN 103 678 324)
Plaintiff
General Electric International, Inc. (ABN 85 002 420 751)
First Defendant
Power Rental Op Co Australia LLC (ARBN 167 060 997)
Second Defendant
Power Rental Asset Co Two, LLC
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Judgment Delivered After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lease is a PPS lease under the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth)
- 2 Whether the lessor (GE) was regularly engaged in the business of leasing goods within s 13(2)(a) PPSA
- 3 Whether the lease is excluded from being a PPS lease
Ratio Decidendi
The lease of the Turbines to Forge Power by GE was a PPS lease as defined by the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth), as GE was regularly engaged in the business of leasing goods both within and outside Australia at the time the lease was entered into; the Turbines did not become fixtures as their installation did not evince an objective intention of permanence; consequently, upon appointment of administrators, any security interest of the defendants in the Turbines vested in Forge Power immediately before that appointment under s 267(2) PPSA, giving Forge Power priority over the Turbines.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff entitled to declaratory relief; plaintiff's title to Turbines is superior; interests of defendants in Turbines vested in plaintiff immediately before appointment of administrators.
Orders
- Plaintiff entitled to declarations as to vesting of interests under s 267(2) PPSA and superiority of title in Turbines
- Parties to bring in Short Minutes; costs to be addressed if necessary
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment