Form Architects (Aust) Pty. Limited v Ku-ring-gai Council [2017] NSWLEC 1107
The Court was satisfied that the existing 1985 cottage was not contributory to the heritage significance of the Wahroonga Heritage Conservation Area and made only a neutral contribution, because it was not from the key Federation or Inter-war periods and had likely been identified as contributory on an erroneous pre-1943 assessment. The proposal maintained a generous landscaped front setback, aligned with neighbouring dwellings to the east, respected the established streetscape pattern, did not unacceptably affect the adjoining heritage item at 3-5 Braeside Street or the Wahroonga Heritage Conservation Area, and remaining driveway crossover concerns could be addressed by condition....
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of Development Application No. 590/15 / Hearing Held After Mandatory Conciliation Under S 34 Aa(2)(a) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Did Not Result in Agreement
- Outcome
- The appeal was upheld and Development Application No. 590/15 was approved subject to conditions of consent.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application for Alterations and Additions' 'wahroonga Heritage Conservation Area' 'contributory Building Assessment' 'impact on Adjoining Heritage Items' 'front Setback and Streetscape' 'driveway Crossover Conditions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of Development Application No. 590/15 / Hearing Held After Mandatory Conciliation Under S 34 Aa(2)(a) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Did Not Result in Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the existing cottage contributes to the heritage significance of the Wahroonga Heritage Conservation Area' 'Whether the proposed alterations and additions would have an unacceptable impact on the heritage significance of the Wahroonga Heritage Conservation Area' 'Whether the proposal would adversely affect the heritage significance, amenity or views to adjoining heritage items at 3-5 Braeside Street' 'Whether the proposed front setback, garage, pool cabana, driveway and landscaping were acceptable having regard to the LEP and DCP controls' 'Whether driveway crossover level and retaining wall concerns could be addressed by condition']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that the existing 1985 cottage was not contributory to the heritage significance of the Wahroonga Heritage Conservation Area and made only a neutral contribution, because it was not from the key Federation or Inter-war periods and had likely been identified as contributory on an erroneous pre-1943 assessment. The proposal maintained a generous landscaped front setback, aligned with neighbouring dwellings to the east, respected the established streetscape pattern, did not unacceptably affect the adjoining heritage item at 3-5 Braeside Street or the Wahroonga Heritage Conservation Area, and remaining driveway crossover concerns could be addressed by condition....
Court Disposition
The appeal was upheld and Development Application No. 590/15 was approved subject to conditions of consent.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No. 590/15 for alterations and additions to the existing dwelling at 7 Braeside Street, Wahroonga, is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure "A".' 'The exhibits, other than exhibits 3, A, B, C E and F, are returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment