Leahey v CSG Business Solutions (Aus) Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1098

Leahey v CSG Business Solutions (Aus) Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1098

The termination of Mr Leahey's employment was not for a reason prohibited by s 340(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth); CSG breached its contractual obligation to set and agree KPIs for STI calculation in a timely manner, depriving Mr Leahey of the opportunity to obtain STI remuneration for FY2015 and FY2016, entitling him to damages for loss of commercial opportunity; Mr Leahey was not a Bad Leaver under the LTI Plan and is entitled to the agreed LTI Amount.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 September 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Contract and Industrial Law Dispute / Post Trial Judgment, Orders, and Directions for Quantification
Outcome
Adverse action claims dismissed; judgment in principle for applicant on contract and LTI claims pending quantification; orders for further case management hearing for quantum and directions.
Legal Topics
['adverse Action' 'workplace Rights' 'employment Contract Construction' 'termination of Employment' 'short Term Incentive (sti)' 'long Term Incentive (lti)' 'damages for Breach of Contract']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Employment Contract and Industrial Law Dispute / Post Trial Judgment, Orders, and Directions for Quantification

  1. 1 ["Whether Mr Leahey's employment was terminated for a prohibited reason under s 340 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)" 'Whether CSG breached its contractual obligation to set and agree KPIs for STI calculation in a timely manner' 'Whether Mr Leahey is entitled to damages for breach of contract relating to STI for FY2015 and FY2016' 'Whether Mr Leahey is entitled to payment for the value of Performance Rights under the LTI Plan' 'Appropriate method of calculating damages for loss of opportunity']

Ratio Decidendi

The termination of Mr Leahey's employment was not for a reason prohibited by s 340(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth); CSG breached its contractual obligation to set and agree KPIs for STI calculation in a timely manner, depriving Mr Leahey of the opportunity to obtain STI remuneration for FY2015 and FY2016, entitling him to damages for loss of commercial opportunity; Mr Leahey was not a Bad Leaver under the LTI Plan and is entitled to the agreed LTI Amount.

Court Disposition

Adverse action claims dismissed; judgment in principle for applicant on contract and LTI claims pending quantification; orders for further case management hearing for quantum and directions.

Orders

  • ['Proceedings listed for case management hearing at 10:15 am on 29 September 2017 to address future conduct and quantification of damages.' 'No orders on costs or quantum until further submissions and agreement between parties.']