Forte Kiama Heights Development Pty Ltd v Kiama Municipal Council [2024] NSWLEC 1390
The Court was satisfied that the parties' agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions because the modified development was substantially the same development as originally approved, relevant notification and ss 4.55 and 4.15 considerations had been addressed, the relevant Kiama Local Environmental Plan and State Environmental Planning Policy matters were satisfied, and the additional height and visual impacts were acceptable. Accordingly, s 34(3) of the Land Environment Court Act 1979 required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Under S 8.9 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Seeking to Modify Development Consent DA No. 10.2022.113.1 / Decision Following Mandatory Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land Environment Court Act 1979 and Agreement Between the Parties
- Outcome
- The appeal was upheld and development consent DA 10.2022.113.1 was modified.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification Application' 'development Consent' 'multi Dwelling Housing' 'r2 Low Density Residential Zone' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties' 'coastal Use Area and Coastal Environment Area' 'building Height Development Standard']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Under S 8.9 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Seeking to Modify Development Consent DA No. 10.2022.113.1 / Decision Following Mandatory Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land Environment Court Act 1979 and Agreement Between the Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the parties' agreed decision was a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the development as modified was substantially the same development as the development for which consent was originally granted.' 'Whether relevant matters under ss 4.55 and 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the relevant environmental planning instruments were satisfied.' 'Whether the proposed height exceedance and visual impacts were acceptable.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that the parties' agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions because the modified development was substantially the same development as originally approved, relevant notification and ss 4.55 and 4.15 considerations had been addressed, the relevant Kiama Local Environmental Plan and State Environmental Planning Policy matters were satisfied, and the additional height and visual impacts were acceptable. Accordingly, s 34(3) of the Land Environment Court Act 1979 required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision.
Court Disposition
The appeal was upheld and development consent DA 10.2022.113.1 was modified.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development consent DA 10.2022.113.1 is modified in the terms in Annexure A.' 'Development consent DA 10.2022.113.1 as modified by the Court is Annexure B.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment